By Carl Benjaminsen
About a year ago, I was having dinner at a Vietnamese restaurant in Sanlitun, a trendy part of central Beijing with shopping malls packed with international brands. With me were Italian and French friends who’d come to China on a government scholarship to study filmmaking.
At the restaurant, a woman in her mid-50s came over and asked if we’d take a photo with her mother. We obliged, and started chatting with them. Her mother, who was in her 70s, was on her first visit to Beijing and wanted a photo with us because this was the first chance she’d had to chat with people from overseas. And her visit to Beijing encompassed a few other firsts. Her first plane flight. Her first visit to a big city. It was, in fact, her first trip outside her rural county in Sichuan Province.
Our perfectly ordinary encounter would have been implausible forty years ago. Only a tiny number of people from overseas were living in China then. The country’s domestic film industry took in $4.6 billion at the box office last year, but in the 1970s you wouldn’t have come here to study film, as the industry was stagnant and little better than dead. And although today China and Vietnam are trading partners to the tune of $100 billion dollars last year, in 1979 they would faceoff on the battlefield.
The extraordinary changes that have taken place in the lives of the two people we met that night were due in no small part to the determination of another Sichuan local, Deng Xiaoping. He led the push to bring a decade of nationwide turmoil to an end with a five-day meeting of the Communist Party of China (CPC) at the Jingxi Hotel in western Beijing on December 22, 1978. The communique that followed the meeting spoke of a shift to “socialist modernization”, “the rapid development of production”, and “acting in accordance with economic laws and attaching importance to the role of the law of value.” It was the start of China’s policy of reform and opening up.
As it happens, the next big step forward was taken far from the capital, in a small village called Xiaogang. Its residents were desperately poor, food was in short supply, and that year’s harvest was dismal. The villagers agreed to secretly split up their collective farmland. Each family would manage one small plot, and they could keep what they grew beyond their share of the village’s production quota. In the context of decades of collectivization and a tightly-controlled command economy, this was an idea so dangerous that they each signed a pact saying they’d look after the children of any farmer punished – perhaps even executed – if their plan was uncovered. The next year, the same land, farmed with the same tools, and growing the same crops, produced a harvest bigger than the previous five years combined. Instead of being punished, the village’s approach spread across the country.
When we talk about innovation in China today, we talk about things like high-speed rail, artificial intelligence, and 5G networks. But equally transformational were the innovative solutions people found to the challenges facing them at the start of the reform period. For example, villages had to work out how to divide their collective property. As MIT economics Professor Huang Yasheng wrote, “some of the assets, such as plow animals or heavy-duty equipment, either were too expensive to be acquired by individual households or were indivisible assets – a donkey cannot be divided in two.” So they turned them into shares the villagers could buy and trade, and the capital this generated allowed some of them to leave farming behind and start their own businesses. This led to a boom in small manufacturers, some of which grew into firms like the whitegoods and electronics giants Kelon and Midea, which bloomed in the Guangdong countryside.
Securitizing a donkey might not sound very transformational. But it’s hard to get across how desperately poor China was back then. The World Bank publishes historical GDP figures in current U.S. dollars that helps illustrate the point. In 1978 the per capita GDP in the United States was $10,587; in Latin America and the Carribean it was $1,575; in the Middle East and North Africa it was $1,366; in Sub-Saharan Africa it was $495.
And in China? In 1978, the per capita GDP was $156 per person. Last year, it was $8,826. It is 57 times higher now than what it was then. In that time, it grew sixfold in the United States and Latin America and the Caribean, fivefold in the Middle East and North Africa, and three-fold in Sub-Saharan Africa.
In 1978, for every 1,000 children born in China, 53 would diein infancy, according to an estimate by the World Health Organization. Thatfigure has plunged to just seven. A child born today can expect to live a fulldecade longer than one born 40 years ago. And they will likely grow up to bemuch better educated: Half the kids in China didn’t go to secondary school in1978, but in 2013 enrolment was at 95 percent. And in the mid-1980s one-thirdof the population was illiterate; at the start of this decade it was around 5percent.
Have the 40 years of reform and opening up been plain sailing? Of course not.
The country has struggled to find a balance between economic development and environmental protection, and it’s widely recognized that the pendulum swung further towards growth than it did towards protecting the country’s ecological wealth. A phrase heavily leaned on by many writers is “the China miracle”. But, although the pace of development was extraordinary, it was no more a miracle than the development of Britain, or the United States, or Japan, and each have their own examples of the price they paid for their development. For a hundred years, London had smog so thick it was nicknamed “pea soup”; in just one four-day stretch in 1952 air pollution killed an estimated 4,000 people in the city. The United States had Love Canal, a neighhourhood of 800 families so contaminated by industrial pollution it was evacuated and demolished. And Japan had Minamata Bay, a town where mercury-ladened wastewater from a local factory poisoned more than 2,000 people.
And China has an uphill battle ahead as it works to address challenges that include an aging population, reforming the finance sector to provide more support to private businesses, and preparing state-owned enterprises so they are better prepared to face the challenges that accompany competing in an increasingly open and globalized marketplace. These are tough challenges for a developing country. China is far more developed than it was 40 years ago, but there’s still a long way to go. The country has 998 million people of working age but only around 6 percent are expected to pay tax next year because they earned more than 5,000 yuan a month – about $8,500 a year. China is home to the world’s second-largest economy, and it’s increasingly prosperous, but it’s not yet rich.
These challenges might seem daunting, perhaps even insurmountable at first glance. But if, in 1978, you’d described the China of today to the elderly mother from Sichuan she’d have perhaps thought you were mad. The last four decades have bought tremendous change to the lives of people across China, and the journey of change is far from over. But the Chinese people have shown a tremendous capacity to study, to work, to start businesses, and to innovate. The achievements of the past 40 years was not a miracle; it was the hard work of more than a billion people that made it happen.
Note: Carl Benjaminsen is an editor and radio host at ChinaRadio International, China Media Group.
Mar 26, 2019 0
The 2018 Boao Forum for Asia (BFA) annual conference is scheduled for April 8 to 11 in Boao, Hainan Province. The forum will be themed "An Open and Innovative Asia for a World of Greater Prosperity."
— The Daily Mail - People's Daily