|
Sighting of Eid moon controversy
THE central Ruyet-i-Hilal Committee has once again failed to make a
timely (some might also want to add correct) announcement about the
sighting of the Eid moon. A short while after the start of its
deliberations on Tuesday evening, some TV channels quoted it as having
declared that the Shawwal moon had not been sighted, and therefore
Eid-ul-Fitr would be celebrated on Thursday. Which, as per a report
carried by this paper a day earlier, was in accord with astronomical
parameters. However, a little later, TV channels started running news
alert strips of reports - backed by the Mardan nazim, several DCOs, and
later ANP leader Ghulam Ahmad Bilour - of the moon having been sighted
in some districts of the Frontier province. The Central Ruyet Committee
went into session to determine the veracity of the new evidence. The
meeting went on and on, until 10:45 when the committee chairman, Mufti
Munibur Rehman, appeared on TV screens to announce that firm evidence
about the sighting of the Shawwal moon had been received, and hence the
Eid would be celebrated on Wednesday. Interesting, the evidence he
mentioned came not from NWFP, but from Badin in Sindh. A few Imams in
Lahore and at least three other Punjab cities, remained unconvinced, and
led the Eid prayers on Thursday instead of Wednesday. The late night
decision, of course, created all sorts of problems for those who,
following the first announcement about the Eid falling on Thursday, had
postponed their last-minute shopping as well as those who had planned to
leave for their far-off family homes the next day.
Even if it was for a small section of the people, the Ruyet-i-Hilal
Committee managed, like so many times in the past, to spoil the joy of
Eid. It also gave cause to some like the JUI chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman
to vent their anger at the committee chairman, demanding his
resignation. The issue, though, is not one of individual competence; it
is related to the manner in which the decision is made. If the procedure
requires that the committee must give due consideration to evidence it
receives from sources other than its provincial bodies, it had little
choice but to look at the evidence that NWFP’s political leadership
wanted to be given due attention. Something can, and should, be done to
avoid such a situation in the future. Since that province, due to its
geographical location, is almost always ahead of the other parts of the
country in claiming Shawwal moon sighting, it would be better if the
committee is permanently headquartered in Peshawar rather than Karachi
or, like earlier on, in Lahore. Better still, perhaps there is need to
consider relying on astronomical calculations to determine the exact
time and location of the lunar appearance. In this age when scientific
knowledge has made it possible for man to leave his footprint on the
moon, we can save ourselves a lot of trouble and unsavoury
controversies. The Ulema from local as well as international
institutions of Islamic learning, such as Egypt’s Jamia Azhar, need to
be asked to put their heads together and give a well reasoned decree -
one which satisfies all shades of religious opinion - to settle the
issue once and for all.
Reasons for financial wreck
SUCH is the panic that has
gripped Americans, in no small measure thanks to the dire disaster
warnings of President George W. Bush himself, many are extremely
grateful that Congress has finally passed the rescue package to bail out
US banks by buying their “toxic loans” at a likely cost to the US
taxpayer of up to $700 billion. “Main Street” resents the bailout of
Wall Street but there is a general acceptance, albeit through gritted
teeth, that if the massive financial rescue had not gone ahead, everyone
would have suffered from an economic collapse and this is almost
certainly true. The problem is that America has been here before and
each time it has been the ordinary Joe Public who has picked up the tab.
The Wall Street Crash of 1929 had a variety of causes but what spun the
markets into collapse was the existence of a pyramid of holding
companies and investment trusts that had no other purpose than to hold
shares in each other. Thus the profits in a rising market were magnified
as shares rose. However when the markets turned down, the inverse effect
kicked in and this apparently magical method of making money led to a
rapid collapse of the house of cards that these companies had
constituted. Part of the problem with the 1929 crash was lack of
regulation. The US financial authorities, of course, acted to ensure
that such a disaster would never occur again. And with the occasional
hiccups, for a little over 50 years, there was no financial meltdown.
But in 1982 Congress was persuaded to liberalize regulation of the
Savings and Loan (S&L) industry to encourage its growth, hitherto
hindered by “unnecessary limitations” on where and how it could invest.
The result eventually was the collapse of some 650 of these S&L
companies — once a byword for prudent investment. The cost to the US
taxpayer was ultimately $1.4 trillion — which given inflation is a
significantly larger sum than that being laid out this week to rescue
Wall Street from its latest piece of snake-oil salesmanship.
The common denominator to each and every financial collapse worldwide —
and the Americans are not alone in suffering these disasters, which
began with the British South Sea Bubble of the 1720s — is not, however,
simply lack of regulation. It is rather the idea that fortunes can be
made at a distant remove from economic fundamentals. In essence banking
involves providing the funding to allow a business to produce goods that
it can sell at a margin, repay the loan and take the difference to
invest in further production and productive capacity. Bankers and indeed
shareholders invest in good companies. They are the only absolute
producers of value. There will be other investment opportunities such as
in commodities like oil and gold, but in essence all of these
investments are made in visible, calculable assets. The minute the
investment itself becomes invisible, it can neither be properly
regulated nor assessed. That is what has produced this latest financial
wreck.
—Arab
News
|