|
SC strikes down graduation condition
By Saad Saud
ISLAMABAD—Supreme Court (SC) has declared null and void graduation
condition for becoming legislator. A citizen Muhammad Nasir had filed
constitutional petition through his counsel Kamran Murtaza in SC
pleading graduation condition was discriminatory and it constituted
breach of fundamental rights.
A larger bench of SC headed by Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Abdul
Hamid Dogar heard the petition. CJP while admitting the petition for
regular hearing issued notice to Attorney General (AG) Malik Qayyum for
April, 18.
Kamran Murtaza counsel for Muhammad Nasir during the hearing of the
petition on April, 18 argued graduation condition was discriminatory and
it was applicable only to general elections-2002. This law has lost its
utility and parliament has also not approved it .
AG Malik Qayyum also termed graduation condition a discriminatory law.
He presented statistics on the graduates population saying only 250000
people were graduates among more than 800 million voters. Allowing only
250000 persons to contest elections is discriminatory , he argued. I
don’t consider it good, he added.
At the inception of hearing on Monday, Kamran Murtaza advocate pleaded
BA condition is inequitable as it renders million of people ineligible
to participate in the elections.
Giving arguments AG also described graduation condition discriminatory.
PML-Q had challenged it in the court when the condition was imposed, he
submitted. But all the facts were not stated before the court. This
issued would have not existed if the supreme court had been informed
about all the facts, he argued.
The larger bench headed by CJP justice Abdul Hamid Dogar gave short
order after two hours of completion of hearing of constitutional
petition filed by Muhammad Nasir. The verdict said graduation condition
was in conflict with article 17 and 25 of the constitution and it was
violative of fundamental rights, therefore it is declared null and void.
Details decision will be announced later.
Political and judicial circles have lauded the decision of the Supreme
Court regarding ending of B.A qualificatiozn for contesting the
elections and has termed the decision as a prudent and democratic
decision by the Supreme Court.
Former state minister Tariq Azeem expressing his views on a Private TV
Channel alongwith other renowned leaders lauded the decision and said
that with the literacy in the Country being a mere 2%, and 23%
non-graduates, about 98% would stand as ineligible to exercise their
democratic obligation.
“Besides many persons got into habit of obtaining a B.A degree by
fair/unfair means, which would hopefully end”, he maintained. The
Attorney General of Pakistan, Malik Abdul Qayyum termed the restriction
as being in direct contravention to article 16 and 26 of the
Constitution, and had been rightly been abolished by Supreme Court
unanimously.
Justice Tariq Mahmood condemned the condition as being an undemocratic
ploy, not implemented by masses’ consent or any parliament legislation.
However Dr. Muhammad Aslam Khaki advocate favored the condition, holding
it responsible for the surfacing of the educated elite within
parliament. And was a blow to the derogatory feudal system. Sheikh
Rashid also favored the abolishment of the condition, and termed it as a
prudent decision of the Supreme Court.
In its short order announced by the bench after an interval of more than
two hours, the bench said, “For reasons to be recorded later, this
petition under Article 184(3) of the Constitution of the Islamic
Republic of Pakistan, 1973 is allowed. The provisions of Article 8A of
the Conduct of General Election Order, 2002 (Chief Executive’s Order No.
7 of 2002) and clause (cc) of subsection (1) of section 99 of the
Representation of the People Act, 1976, which lays down that a person
shall not be qualified to be elected or chosen as a member of
Majlis-e-Shoora (parliament) or a Provincial Assembly unless he is at
least a graduate possessing a bachelor degree in any discipline or any
degree recognized as equivalent by the University Grants Commission
under the University Grants Commission Act, 1974 or any other law for
the time being . |