|
Actors guild agrees to deal with film
company
Showbiz
Desk
LOS ANGELES—The Screen Actors Guild has agreed to let members work for
one independent film company if actors strike against major movie
studios within months, and similar deals with other firms could ease
pressure on small film and TV producers. The “interim agreement” was
signed with The Film Department as negotiations between SAG and the
Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers (AMPTP) continued on
Thursday with no word from either party on any progress.
Spokespeople for SAG and the AMPTP, who began new contract talks earlier
this week, declined to comment on the interim agreement, and it was
unclear if other independent companies had approached SAG about similar
agreements. Mark Gill, who heads The Film Department, said his company
approached SAG with the idea, and that the “interim agreement” was
similar to deals the Writers Guild of America signed with some
independent producers late last year allowing them to work during a
crippling 100-day writers strike.
“Essentially what (the agreement) says is we can proceed with our films,
and if they (SAG) reach an agreement with the studios, we will abide by
that agreement,” Gill told Reuters. Roughly 10,500 WGA members struck
against major studios represented by the AMPTP in November last year,
and the work stoppage lasted into February.
The strike cost the Los Angeles-area more than $2 billion in lost wages
and revenues to businesses like taxi services and restaurants that cater
to the entertainment industry. Key issues in that labour dispute
cantered on how writers would be paid when their work appeared on the
Internet, and many of the same issues are being addressed by SAG in its
current talks with the AMPTP.
SAG, which has some 120,000 film and TV actors, sees its contract expire
on June 30, and many industry players are concerned that SAG leadership
also might not be able to reach an accord with the studios and call for
a strike. Gill said some actors were reluctant to start work on projects
that might still be in production if and when a strike was called. Those
actors would run the risk of starting a project that might never be
finished. “That was a problem for everybody,” Gill said. |