|
RAW’s hand established
S M Hali
TWO powerful blasts rocked the provincial metropolis Tuesday morning
resulting in the death of 28 persons and injuries to over 150 others,
sending a wave of panic across the city. According to police sources, 20
persons were killed and 150 injured in the powerful blast at the FIA
Office at Temple Road here, while four were killed in a blast in Model
Town, where three persons were reported injured. CCPO Lahore, Malik
Muhammad Iqbal talking to newsmen said it was suspected that the blast
at FIA Office was caused by a suicide bomber who came on a car loaded
with explosive material and blew himself up. The blast was so powerful
that the FIA building was badly damaged while window panes of buildings
in the surrounding area including the Mall were shattered. The 114
injured including women and 45 school children were shifted to Sir Ganga
Ram Hospital. Hospital sources said the students of the school situated
near the FIA building had been brought to the hospital with minor
injuries, caused mostly by glass splinters from the breaking windowpanes
of their classrooms.
The other blast which took place in Model Town claimed the lives of four
persons including two children, while three others sustained injuries.
The front of the building at 83-4 Model Town, which served as the office
of an advertising agency, was totally destroyed in the powerful
explosion caused by a suicide bomber who drove a vehicle into the
building and detonated the explosive material. The servant’s residential
quarters and a house adjoining the building were also badly damaged. Two
of those killed in the blast at Model Town have been identified as 8
year old Seemi and 10 year old Muhammad Hussain. Another victim of the
blast was a woman whose identity could not be ascertained immediately,
while the fourth was suspected to be the suicide bomber.
The heinous crime, which indicates that terrorists and suicide bombers
strike with impunity, depicts another more macabre aspect of the gory
episode. Within hours of the atrocious deed, renowned RAW operative, B.
Raman, came up with his detailed account of the terrible blasts in his
story titled ‘One More Suicide Attack’, published in Outlook, within the
space of moments; the same article was religiously carried by the RAW
propaganda outlet: South Asia Analysis Group (SAAG).
Mr. Bahukutumbi Raman, commonly known as B. Raman, former Additional
Secretary Government of India, ex-head of the counter-terrorism division
of Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) and the author of an insider account
of India’s infamous intelligence agency RAW: “The Kaoboys of R&AW: Down
Memory Lane”, which is a memoir of the former spymaster who spent 27
years working in Intelligence Bureau (IB) and RAW, “Intelligence—Past,
Present & Future” and “A Terrorist State as a Frontline Ally”; now
contributes generously to various Indian dailies and journals with an
obsession of targeting Pakistan. He provides analyses of any and every
event in Pakistan; at the drop of a hat, he is there to offer his
slanderous opinion, which is religiously carried by SAAG.
With his usual twist, Mr. B. Raman writes: “The FIA is the Pakistani
equivalent of India’s Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). It is the
principal agency for the investigation of all corruption-related cases.
It also co-ordinates terrorism-related investigations. It is one of the
three central police agencies of Pakistan—the other two being the
Intelligence Bureau (IB) and the Narcotics Bureau. The FIA is largely
manned by police officers taken on deputation from the provinces and
direct recruits. President Pervez Musharraf had inducted a number of
serving and retired military officers into it to monitor the
investigation of corruption-related cases against Mrs. Benazir Bhutto,
Mr. Asif Zardari, Mr. Nawaz Sharif and other political leaders.
Before the recent elections and thereafter, the investigations into all
the corruption-related cases against Benazir and Zardari were
discontinued on the orders of Musharraf, but not the investigations
against Nawaz. Gen. Ashfaq Pervez Kiyani withdrew from it the serving
military officers deputed for monitoring the investigations. The FIA had
always been considered a highly politicized agency used by different
leaders for witch-hunt against their opponents. It became particularly
controversial during the second tenure of Benazir as the Prime Minister
from 1993 to 1996. Zardari was accused of misusing the FIA and its
officers for allegedly harassing his political opponents and
businessmen, who were reluctant to pay commissions. Before Benazir
returned from political exile on October 18, 2007, her associates
decided not to leave her security totally in the hands of the
government, but to make their own arrangements for her security. Zardari,
then based in Dubai, co-coordinated the security arrangements. To assist
him, he chose Mr. Rahman Malik, a highly controversial Police officer
who was in the FIA during her second tenure as the Prime Minister. There
were widespread allegations of corruption against Malik. When Mr. Farooq
Leghari, the then President of Pakistan, dismissed Benazir in November,
1996, he also dismissed Malik and ordered his arrest on charges of
corruption. He managed to escape to London and was living in exile since
then. From London, he was co-coordinating her security during her
travels abroad. Sections of the Pakistani media blamed him for alleged
negligence which, according to them, led to her assassination on
December 27, 2007, at Rawalpindi. Despite this, he continues to enjoy
the confidence of Zardari and acts as one of his principal advisers. He
also acts as the liaison man with the security agencies for ensuring the
physical security of Zardari.
The present wave of suicide attacks started after the commando raid in
the Lal Masjid in July, 2007. Initially, the suicide terrorists were
targeting the Army, the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) and the
Special Services Group (SSG), a US-trained commando group of the Army,
all of which were involved in the Lal Masjid raid. They then attacked
political leaders, who had supported the commando action. This included
some workers of the Pakistan People’s Party (PPP), who were attacked in
Islamabad, Benazir Bhutto and Mr. Aftab Ahmed Khan Sherpao, who was the
Interior Minister during the commando action. He escaped two suicide
attacks. They then attacked targets in the Army, the Frontier Corps and
the Air Force, which were involved in the military operations in the
Federally-Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) and the North-West Frontier
Province (NWFP). Thereafter, they attacked the Naval War College in
Lahore. The Pakistan Navy is a member of a multi-nation naval task force
which provides naval cover to the US operations in Afghanistan. It also
provides security for the unloading at Karachi of logistic supplies for
the NATO forces in Afghanistan.
They have also attacked provincial police units and officers. Many
police officers performing physical security duties were killed when the
jihadis attacked non-police targets. Now, for the first time, they have
attacked an important office of a central police agency. Like the CBI in
India, the FIA not only investigates cases of corruption, but also
supervises the investigation by the police of important terrorism
attacks. Where necessary, it investigates the terrorism cases itself
just as the CBI investigated the assassination of Rajiv Gandhi. It has
been monitoring and co-coordinating the investigation of the
assassination of Benazir Bhutto allegedly at the instance of Baitullah
Mehsud, the Amir of the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan. The attack on the FIA
office came two days after the reported issue of a warrant by an
Anti-Terrorism court for the arrest of Baitullah on a charge of
masterminding her assassination. It is not clear why the jihadis
attacked the advertising agency.”
Mr. B. Raman has overplayed his hand. The haste, with which he produced
his “scholarly sleuthing masterpiece”, indicates that he had prior
knowledge of the attack. Apparently, Mr. B. Raman had his article ready,
complete with details, all he did was fill in the blanks regarding the
number of casualties and present his op-ed. Since he is an established
RAW operative, it is confirmed now beyond the shadow of doubt that RAW
is involved in attempting to destabilize Pakistan to put the government
in waiting and President Musharraf under pressure. RAW has been
pressurizing Pakistan through its operatives in Afghanistan but has now
made inroads within Pakistan to strike at the provincial metropolis and
the capital. Their macabre needs need to be exposed to the world.
Repatriation of refugees is imperative
Furzana Shaheen
FOLLOWING decades of war and civil strife, Afghans constituted the
world’s largest refugee population, with 8 million people scattered in
over 70 countries across the globe at the height of their exodus.
Thousands of Afghan people continued to leave during the 90s as internal
factional and ethnic conflicts persisted. Internal displacement due to
violence, drought, and poverty was also significant. Afghanistan’s
economy has collapsed, a large segment of public and private property
stand destroyed and productive assets have fallen into disrepair.
Consequently, rural and urban communities have fragmented and families
have split up. Most of the Afghan people have taken refuge in Pakistan
and Iran.
Pakistan is still hosting the world’s largest single case load of
refugee population of 3.2 million approximately. Islamabad has provided
shelter and support to Afghan refugees despite great social, economic,
cultural, and demographic ramifications during the last 3 decades. There
are 43 Afghan refugee camps in Pakistan, out of which 30 are in NWFP, 12
in Balochistan, and 1 in Punjab. Out of these camps, Kacha Garhi camp in
NWFP has been closed and closure of Jalozaicamp is in process. Due to
various reasons including the onset of harsh winter season, Government
of Pakistan in line with its traditional hospitality and brotherly
relations with Afghanistan, has agreed to extend the deadline for the
closure of Jalozai camp.
The worsening security situation in the most of the parts of Afghanistan
is effectively impeding the return of these refugees to their homeland.
In the past the repatriation of Afghan refugees was viewed as
progressing at somewhat satisfactory level but the recent drastic fall
in numbers has created many difficulties and injected complications for
the Pakistani host. Islamabad desires a successful voluntary and
comprehensive’ repatriation of Afghan refugees, therefore, it entered
into the Comprehensive Repatriation and Reintegration Strategy 2007-2009
with UNHCR (United Nations High Commission for Refugees) and the
Government of Afghanistan in February 2007 to resolve the refugee
problem. Under this strategy, all refugees are to be repatriated by
2009.
The foreigners on Pakistan’s soil are not only our economic burden but
their presence has evolved some dangerous dimensions; in so far as
Pakistan’s internal security is concerned. Afghan refugees in Pakistan
attract accusations of involvement in smuggling, drug trafficking,
terrorism, and the ongoing insurgency in Waziristan and other tribal
areas. This is further exacerbated by the lack of border management and
the continued unregulated movements of people, particularly to and from
Afghanistan. Unless and until the security situation in Afghanistan
improves, the number of returnees is likely to further drop. Most of the
Afghan refugees are reluctant to repatriate, citing unwillingness once
again to undergo the traumas of displacement, the inability of the
Afghan authorities to provide even minimal services to which they have
become accustomed, and the absence of guaranteed economic security. One
of the refugees said that, “It is much better to stay here in Pakistan
until there is security, peace, and economic incentives in Afghanistan”.
Restoring security, reviving reconstruction and development can pull
these refugees back to their homeland. There is a need to provide
incentives to settle them to the towns and villages where they lived
before their displacement. The presence of Afghan refugees in Pakistan
has already complicated the situation in Pakistan and- gave birth to
many unanticipated social and economic problems. Due to emerging
implications, the longstanding presence of Afghan refugees on Pakistan’s
soil has increasingly begun to emerge as an irritant to bilateral
relations between Pakistan and Afghanistan.
It is said that Afghan refugee camps provide safe havens for insurgents
who easily cross back and forth across the busy and porous border and
the relations between Kabul and Islamabad have been strained for
tit-for-tat accusations about the roots of insurgency and the
whereabouts of Taliban and AI-Qaeda leaders. The people of Pakistan are
doing everything t6 facilitate their stay in Pakistan but accommodating
attitude of some of the refugees to provide cover to the Taliban inject
complications for Pakistan. Afghan and the Western media invariably
without undertaking proper investigation puts out reports in such a way
that it generates the impression that it is being done with the
connivance of Pakistan’s Government. But what they have failed to
acknowledge is that Pakistan is doing all it can to curb cross-border
infiltration.
Islamabad has decided to fence the 2,430km Pak-Afghan porous border,
laying down mines, establishing 1000 security check-posts as compared to
just 100 on Afghan side, introducing biometric identity checks on the
Pakistani side of the border, initiating peace jirga commissions,
closing of refugee camps, and repatriation of Afghan refugees to address
the issue of cross-border infiltration. The Government of Pakistan is
also doing the registration of Afghan refugees and registered Afghans
are given PoR (Proof of Registration) cards with a validity of three
years. The data from the registration exercise is helpful in providing a
sharper profile of the Afghan refugees. There are 2.153 million
registered refugees in Pakistan and 0.314 million refugees are
non-registered. This registration would eliminate all chances of illegal
entry and stay of Afghans in Pakistan.
Despite acknowledging Pakistan’s support for her Afghan brethren, Karzai
and his international supporters alleged Islamabad of sponsoring
insurgents in Afghanistan to fight ISAF and Afghan forces. While
Pakistan’s major objective is to have a friendly and stable Afghanistan,
it appears that the developments in Afghanistan have invariably
influenced the Afghan decision makers to employ the strategy of shifting
responsibilities in one form or the other. Despite blaming Pakistan, the
international community should expedite the refugees’ return to
Afghanistan creating conducive conditions in this regard.
The Comprehensive Repatriation and Reintegration Strategy 2007-2009
should be implemented to resolve the refugee issue and it would not be
possible without mutual assent of Government of Pakistan, government of
Afghanistan and UNHCR. On the other hand, Government of Pakistan must
adhere to the closure of refugee camps without any further delay because
these camps pose a ‘security threat’ to Pakistan. Closure of these camps
is necessary to eliminate safe havens for militants crossing the border
to and from Afghanistan. Repatriation efforts must comply with the
international law and previous agreements by a Tripartite Commission
comprised of Pakistan, Afghanistan, and UNHCR must be followed. Afghan
Government should envisage return issues in accordance with its
absorption capacity, its security constraints and realistic development
prospects because a stable and peaceful Afghanistan can accelerate the
return of the Afghan refugees and it would be possible by the joint
efforts of Pakistan, Afghanistan, and UNHCR.
Nuclear safety in India
Mohammad Asad
ON February 18, Indian police arrested six persons at Virpur bus stand
in Supal district along Indo-Nepal border. They were trying to smuggle
four kilograms of low-grade uranium, worth Rs 50 million across the
border. This is not an isolated incident. Since 1980, scores of theft of
radioactive material from India’s mines, nuclear installations, and
hospitals have taken place.
As India is a signatory to international conventions on safety of
nuclear materials, it is bound to report thefts of nuclear materials to
international bodies. As reporting such incidents bespeaks poor safety
standards, so India tries to hush up such incidents. Take the case of
material recovered from G. R. Arun, a post-graduate in structural
engineering, S. Murthi, a medical practitioner, and C. Mohan, all
residents of Erode (Kalpakkam, Tamil Nadu). In their complaint to
police, the Indra Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research, Kalpakkam reported
that the afore-mentioned persons had stolen material which had the
presence of U-235 and U-238 isotopes (1.40 to 2.20 per cent). The
police, initially tried to close the case on grounds that the material
seized was not uranium but limenite, a non-strategic substance having
ordinary industrial applications. The Centre insisted that the case
should be investigated by India’s Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).
It was later confirmed by the CBI that the allegation in the complaint
was correct. In another incident, Bangladesh Atomic Energy Commission
confirmed that the football-size package recovered from some Indians in
a border village contained 225 grams of uranium oxide. The attention of
international media remains riveted on Pakistan. Had such incidents
happened in Pakistan, it would have been speculated that the thieves
were members of some ultra-religious outfit.
Aside from the hushed-up cases, India has reported 25 `confirmed’ cases
of `stolen or missing’ uranium to the International Atomic Energy
Agency. The reports boast about recovery of uranium in varying forms and
quantities from `thieves’. The recoveries include fifty-seven pounds of
uranium in rod form, eight kilograms in granular form, two hundred grams
in semi-processed form, besides twenty-five kilograms in radio-active
form, stolen from the Bibi Cancer Hospital. Following events speak
volumes on state of nuclear safety in India. `Thieves’ stole three
cobalt switches, worth Rs. 1.5 million, from Tata Steel Company
laboratory at Jamshedpur (Jharkhand). A shipment of beryllium (worth US$
24 million), was caught in Vilnius, on its way to North Korea. A ship,
carrying dual-use aluminum oxide from India to North Korea was
intercepted by Taiwanese authorities. India should tighten its control
over its nuclear mines and installations. The stolen material could be
used for making dirty bombs. Such bombs may not be so destructive. But,
they could create widespread fear as Geiger meters would detect
radiation leaks from them. Moreover, the handling of stolen radio-active
material poses a hazard to ecology and human health.
|