Home | Headlines | City | Sports | Showbiz | Editorial | Columns | Article | Horoscope | Archive | Contact Us

 

 Print This Page  Add To Favourite    

A sound economic future
Hu Jintao

CHINA used to target “rapid and sound” economic growth. The fact that soundness is preferred to speed for China’s economic growth reflects an important change in the economic outlook of the CPC—China is beginning to value the quality of economic growth rather than the speed. How to attain the goal of sound and rapid development for the national economy is the subject of Hu’s eight-point proposal. Point I: Enhance China’s capacity for independent innovation and make China an innovative country
Quote: We will speed up forming a national innovation system and support basic research, research in frontier technology and technological research for public welfare. We will step up our efforts to establish a market-oriented system for technological innovation, in which enterprises play the leading role and which combines the efforts of enterprises, universities and research institutes, and guide and support the concentration of factors of innovation in enterprises, thereby promoting the translation of scientific and technological advances into practical productive forces. We will deepen reform of the system for managing science and technology, optimize the allocation of relevant resources, and improve the legal guarantee, policy system, incentive mechanism and market conditions to encourage technological innovation and the application of scientific and technological achievements in production. We will implement the strategy for intellectual property rights. We will make the best use of international resources of science and technology. We will continue to create conditions conducive to innovation, train world-class scientists and leaders in scientific and technological research, inspire creative wisdom and bring forth large numbers of innovative personnel.
Interpretation: It was decided at the Fifth Plenary Session of the 16th CPC Central Committee in October 2005 that China would make the enhancement of innovation a strategic point in economic and social development. Many enterprises and research and development (R&D) institutions have increased spending in innovation. Industries including aerospace, iron and steel, medical treatment, automobile, electronics, IT and machinery manufacturing, own many core technologies with independent intellectual property rights. Statistics from the World Intellectual Property Organization show that in the past decade, the number of registered patents worldwide had grown by 70 percent. During the same period the number of registered patents in China had increased by 488 percent. In the future, China will focus on making breakthroughs in core technologies that play a key role in promoting economic and social development. Point II: Accelerate transformation of the mode of economic development and promote upgrading of the industrial structure
Quote: We will develop a modern industrial system, integrate IT application with industrialization, push our large industries to grow stronger, invigorate the equipment manufacturing industry, and eliminate outdated production capacities. We will upgrade new- and hi-tech industries and develop information, biotechnology, new materials, aerospace, marine and other industries. We will develop the modern service industry and raise the level of the service sector and its share in the economy. We will step up efforts to improve basic industries and infrastructure and accelerate development of a modern energy industry and a comprehensive transport system. We will ensure the quality and safety of products. We will encourage formation of internationally competitive conglomerates.
Interpretation: One of the priorities for the Party since the 16th CPC National Congress in 2002 has been to adjust the industrial structure and promote the upgrade of industrial restructuring. Since the release of the Catalogue for the Guidance of Adjustment to Industrial Structure in 2005, China has achieved remarkable results in adjusting its industrial structure. A large number of outdated production capacities have been eliminated in the electric power, iron and steel, electrolytic aluminum, chemical, coal and paper-making industries. A total of 55 million tons of outdated production capacities were put into disuse in the iron and steel industry in 2005 and 2006, and 110 million tons, in the coal industry in 2006. The electric power industry will eliminate small outdated power generating units of 50 megawatts this year. The Chinese Government is vigorously supporting hi-tech industries such as electronics and telecommunications through tariff reduction and exemption for machinery or equipment imported for the electronic and telecom sectors. The National Development and Reform Commission approved 539 hi-tech projects which are encouraged to develop. Up to now, the rapid growth of investment in iron and steel, coal, electric power and electrolytic aluminum industries has been put under control, while the development of information, biotechnology, new materials, aerospace, marine and other industries has been accelerated. Point III: Balance urban and rural development and build a new socialist countryside
Quote: We will continue to take developing modern agriculture and invigorating the rural economy as a primary task, strengthen infrastructure in rural areas, and improve the system of rural markets and that of services for agriculture. We will increase policy measures to support and benefit agriculture, rural areas and farmers, strictly protect arable land, increase spending on agriculture, promote advances in agriculture-related science and technology, and improve overall agricultural production capacity to ensure food security for the nation. We will intensify efforts to prevent and control animal and plant epidemic diseases and improve the quality and safety of agricultural products. To increase farmers’ income, we will develop rural enterprises, expand county economies, and transfer rural labor out of farming through various channels. We will enhance poverty reduction through development. We will deepen the comprehensive rural reform, promote reform and innovation in the rural banking system, and reform the system of collective forest rights. We will uphold the basic system for rural operations, stabilize and improve land contract relations, improve the market for transferring land contract and management rights in accordance with the law and on a voluntary and compensatory basis, and develop various forms of appropriate large-scale operations where conditions permit. We will explore effective forms of collective economic operations, develop specialized farmers’ cooperatives, and support the industrialized operation of agriculture and the development of leading agribusinesses.
Interpretation: The plan for building a new socialist countryside as set forth in the Fifth Plenary Session of the 16th CPC Central Committee has been smoothly implemented with overall healthy results. In 2007, a total of 391.7 billion yuan will be allocated from the central budget for agriculture, rural areas and farmers. This is 52 billion yuan, or 15.3 percent, more than was provided for 2006. The building of a new countryside ensures sustained increases of farmers’ income. The increase of farmers’ net per-capita income has exceeded 6 percent for three consecutive years since 2004. By June this year, 720 million farmers, or 82.8 percent of the agricultural population nationwide, had participated in the pilot program of a new-style rural cooperative medical care system. A nationwide basic minimum cost of living allowance system for rural residents has been put in place. Currently, the system covers 20.68 million farmers. The government has abolished the tax on special agricultural products, the animal husbandry tax and the slaughter tax nationwide, and relieved farmers of the burden of up to 120 billion yuan in 2006 in comparison to that in 1999.
Point IV: Improve energy, resources, ecological and environmental conservation and enhance China’s capacity for sustainable development Quote: We will develop and extend advanced and appropriate technologies for conserving, substituting and recycling energy and resources, develop clean and renewable energy sources, protect land and water resources and set up a scientific, rational system for using energy and resources more efficiently. We will develop environmental conservation industries. We will increase spending on energy and environmental conservation with the focus on intensifying prevention and control of water, air and soil pollution and improving the living environment for both urban and rural residents. We will improve water conservancy, forestry and grasslands and promote restoration of the ecosystems. We will enhance our capacity to respond to climate change and make new contributions to protecting the global climate.
Interpretation: China is abundant in energy and resources, but the per-capita share is small. China’s per-capita freshwater availability stands at 2,200 cubic meters, only about a quarter of the world average. Per-capita arable land is 0.09 hectares, less than 40 percent of the world average. The per-capita forestry area gives an average of 0.13 hectares, only one fifth of the world average. The per-capita shares of 45 varieties of major minerals in China are less than the half of the world average. The severe problem of environmental pollution accompanying economic growth has remained to be solved. As a result, it is crucial to the survival and development of the nation to improve energy efficiency and mitigate the burden on ecological environment protection due to energy consumption increases. Measures adopted in the past several years to save energy and resources and protect the ecological environment have yielded results. China’s energy consumption per unit of GDP in the first half of this year dropped 2.78 percent from the same period last year. Point V: Promote balanced development among regions and improve the pattern of land development.
Quote: In detail, in compliance with the laws governing the market economy, we will work beyond administrative divisions to form a number of close-knit economic rims and belts that will provide a strong impetus to the development of other areas. Taking a path of urbanization with Chinese characteristics, we will promote balanced development of large, medium-sized and small cities and towns on the principle of balancing urban and rural development, ensuring rational distribution, saving land, providing a full range of functions and getting larger cities to help smaller ones. Focusing on increasing the overall carrying capacity of cities, we will form city clusters with megacities as the core so that they can boost development in other areas and become new poles of economic growth. Interpretation: The gap in development among regions remains a major problem in China’s economic development. Important measures the Chinese Government has adopted to promote balanced development among regions include the rejuvenation of the old industrial bases in northeast China, vigorously promoting the development in the central region and actively supporting the eastern coastal region to take the lead in development.
The central budget has allocated more than 130 billion yuan to the rejuvenation of northeast China from 2003 until now, and will spend more than 720 billion yuan in the project of West China Development from 2006 to 2010. To narrow the widening gap in development of different regions and the regional gap in social welfare for local residents will remain a major task for China’s economic and social development as well as a basic consideration for the planning of strategies for balanced development among regions.

(The Daily Mail-Beijing Review Articles Exchange Item)


When despots hold sway
Munir Daair

DEMOCRACY has one glitch; people become free. Otherwise, it’s a wonderful system! In the Islamic world, that glitch of democracy has ensured the virtual absence of democracy. Of course, the battle tanks of “operation phantom WMDs” brought to implant democrazy and pass it as democracy in Iraq, as an alternative cause célèbre for a war plan gone awry, did not help matters. The outcome, perhaps intended, has only strengthened those regimes that claim Muslims are not capable of democracy. But there is another anti-democratic ploy gradually becoming evident, played out by the most unlikely bed-fellows in a sinister triangle.
Self-appointed guardians of the faith who claim democracy is un-Islamic (because, God forbid, it equates the ignorant with the learned!) have found common cause with governments who deny their people democracy. The triangle was completed by the battle tanks of “operation democrazy” that entered Iraq. See how neatly the triangle worked out? You may, if you wish, call that the offshoot and fringe benefit of “operation oil”. Within that neat, yet sinister triangle, the real forces of democracy find themselves strangulated. The regimes banish democracy from taking root in any serious way. The self-appointed guardians issue fatwas (religious rulings) that fraudulently misrepresent democracy as un-Islamic. And both continue to survive assured of super power military and political cover.
In the midst of all that, of course, the war on terror baloney continues, with its post 9/11 licence to kill and violate civil liberties. Those who challenge the dictatorships and their foreign protectors are branded as terrorists. Those who challenge fraudulent religious interpretations, especially where free thought, debate and the rights of women are concerned, are branded as heretics. In medieval Europe, the dictatorship of the church caused religion to lose its appeal among people who mistook the Church’s fraudulent dictates to be Christianity’s dictates. This created anti-church sentiments and greatly contributed to the growth of atheism. In the Muslim world we run a similar risk as debate becomes restricted by the self appointed guardians of the faith, who, together with the political establishment, set the agenda and then misinterpret Islam to serve that agenda.
Going forward, unless sensible minds prevail, we may actually find ourselves, in the Islamic world, re-living the Christian world’s age of the inquisition. What applies to one Muslim country applies to many others. The modus operandi might differ, yet the objectives and the results are the same. George Bush’s democracy rhetoric notwithstanding, the prospect for real democracy in the Arab and Islamic world is more threatened now than ever before. Pakistan is only the latest casualty. Others may follow.
In dealing with democratic forces and others who demand reforms, the powers that be, tragically, have decided on confrontation rather than accommodation, on marginalisation rather than co-existence, to depend on foreign power rather than the mandate of their own people. Musharraf’s need to allocate a portion of his national address to speak, in English, to the US public painfully symbolises the extent to which local dictators have become isolated from their own people and rely, for their survival, on the protection of foreign powers.
In many countries of the Islamic world today, despotic rulers build powerful military forces and efficient Intelligence apparatus, not to provide safeguards against foreign attack, not to protect the nation from external threats, but to protect their own despotic survival against their own masses. To the untrained eye our present state of affairs in the Islamic world is the result of an unyielding religious faith that first produces fanatics then sends them out to die and kill others for causes too complex to understand. Yet, in reality, it is the consequence of the dichotomy between an oppressive minority and an oppressed majority on the one hand and a political fait accompli imposed by external forces whose geopolitical and economic ambitions are exceeded only by their lethal power and willingness to use it.
But then, why is there such a dichotomy and why are Muslim governments, almost everywhere, adamantly opposed by their subjects? The answer to these questions can be found in the Islamic world’s dilapidated government classrooms, pathetic health care centres, inefficient and corrupted bureaucracies, unfair wealth distribution, scarce employment opportunities and a frustrated youth who represent more than 60 per cent of our population. Add to these realities, the violence unleashed by occupation forces against the civilian populations of Palestine, Iraq, Afghanistan and who knows where else soon, together with the abusive control these foreign powers have over the resources and the governments of the region. Couple all that with the double standards that insult the intelligence of our populations, you have a ready recipe for the turmoil that engulfs Pakistan today and other nations of the region tomorrow.—Khaleej Times




GCC Summit: Prospects & challenges
Abdulaziz O Sager

THE GCC leaders will meet in the first week of December in Doha, Qatar for their regular annual summit meeting to discuss the current issues and future challenges facing the GCC nations and the region in general. Most likely the final communiqué of the summit will refer to the usual Gulf concerns and other regional issues of interest. However, the Iranian nuclear crisis will definitely be at the forefront of these issues. Relations between Iran and the GCC states cannot be limited to the nuclear issue. This is not to underestimate the importance of this issue to the GCC countries. The concern felt by the GCC states can be partly attributed to some extreme statements and actions by the Iranian government over other issues of interest. Thus, it is important to view the Iranian nuclear crisis within the wider context of the policies and attitudes of the Iranian regime toward the Gulf region in particular and the Arab world in general.
Since Iran is an Islamic state, and a neighbor of the Arab world, it is imperative for Gulf-Iranian relationships to be based on the firm foundation of mutual interests, friendly neighborliness, respect of sovereignty and noninterference in internal affairs. However, the problem is with the confrontational nature of the policies of the Iranian regime which creates a state of instability in the region. Much of this emanates from internal conflicts and imbalances within the Iranian political system. Of course we cannot ignore the other sources of instability in the region, chief among which is the failure of US policies in Iraq, which ultimately works to the interest of Iran. In this context, it could be said that the interventionist nature of Iranian policy vis-a-vis Arab affairs has the same dangerous impact as the Iranian nuclear policy. This aggressive policy has damaging effects on the security of the Arab world in the near and long term. Iran is controlling the main centers of power within the Iraqi state. It has virtual domination over the political process and decision-making mechanism in Iraq. It plays a major role in the political and security scene in Lebanon, and has a clear presence in Palestinian politics. This is in addition to its total rejection of any possible peaceful solution to the issue of its occupation of the three UAE islands. Some recent statements from within Iran repeated the old false claims that the sovereign Kingdom of Bahrain is just another Iranian province.
Also, Iran has failed until now to build confidence among its neighbors in the Gulf region and reassure them about its nuclear program. The GCC summit will be held at a time when the option of a military confrontation over the Iranian nuclear crisis is gaining considerable momentum. Iran under Ahmadinajad is more or less taking the same position as Iraq under Saddam Hussein, which led to catastrophic results. The two UN Security Council resolutions 1737 and 1747 called upon Iran to suspend, with immediate effect, all enrichment-related and reprocessing activities on its territory. Since March 2006, the UN Security Council has repeated its calls, but Iran continued with its enrichment process, while the political and military leadership of the country raised the level of political rhetoric.
It is worth mentioning here that the call for the suspension of uranium enrichment activities is no longer an American or European demand; rather, it has become an urgent requirement by the international community. It is a demand that has the credence of international legality conferred upon it by the UN Security Council resolutions.—Arab News
 

Copyright © 2007 The Daily Mail.  All rights reserved