|
Media fumes at firecracker world record attempt
CHANGSHA—Chinese media have
blasted an attempt by a Chinese city in Hunan province to set a world
record for the longest string of firecrackers, labeling it “ridiculous”
and a waste of money.
A 20-km string of firecrackers, stretching from Dayao Town to the
downtown area of Liuyang City, home to China’s largest firecracker
production base, went up in smoke on Friday afternoon, exploding for 68
minutes and littering the ground with red debris, as organizers sought
to gain publicity for the city and its local fireworks industry.
The event, organized by several firecracker plants and partly sponsored
by the local government, cost more than 800,000 yuan (about US$107,000),
including 580,000 yuan for the firecrackers themselves and the remainder
to stage the event and ensure the fire service was on standby. “The
production of firecrackers is one of the city’s main industries. We hope
the success of making the longest firecracker will increase the
confidence of the producers and make our city well-known across the
country,” said Xu Qiangguo, head of the Liuyang Firecrackers Bureau.
But the event, billed by local media as a Guinness World Record attempt,
was not attended by an official Guinness World Records representative
after it ignored a request from the organizers to attend.
Instead, a representative from the unofficial Shanghai Great World
Guinness Book of Records turned up to present them with a certificate
bestowing upon the city the honour of having only “the country’s longest
string of firecrackers”. “I can only ensure you that it’s the longest
firecracker in China and I dare not say it’s the world’s longest,” said
the Shanghai office’s representative Wang Yizhuo. “Firecrackers were
traditionally used to ward off evils but burning crackers is more of a
token of celebrations and festivals nowadays. I think this longest
string of crackers reflect the happy and peaceful life of the people,”
he said.
A flood of opinion pieces from newspapers around the country waded in
with their assessments. “Such a record is ridiculous, just like to
sharpen the two ends of a tree and apply for the record of the longest
toothpick,” a journalist with the Jinan Times said.
The Beijing Times said, “Unless the firecrackers are supposed to be part
of a cinematic scene of raging war, what benefits would accrue from
setting off 20 kilometers of fireworks?”
The newspaper went on to bemoan the country’s lack of creativity. “We
are no less than a manufacturing base for the world. We may continue to
set records in a similar manner, but that will not add a jot to our
overall competitiveness,” the article said.
The Liuyang authorities also came under fire from a writer from the
Guangzhou Daily, who called the event a “real burden for the local
economy”. “It’s high time to call off applications for the professed
‘longest’ or ‘most’ records, such as 10,000 people eating hotpot and
10,000 people washing their feet together. They lack social significance
as well as scientific and technical skills,” he wrote. “Some local
governments like to spend a fortune creating a record in order to
attract attention. But after the sensation only some meaningless numbers
are left.”
But the man behind the spectacle Xu Qiangguo remained defiant and said
he was considering applying for the official world record next year. “I
don’t think it’s a waste of money because we have got what we wanted:
extensive media coverage and more orders,” he said. “If you call that
too luxurious, how about the existence of so many five-star hotels? They
are even more luxurious.”
Several onlookers in Liuyang agreed. “The firecracker industry is the
pillar industry of the city and making such a long one will promote our
firecrackers’ fame and maybe even make them world renowned,” one said.
Meanwhile the controversy surrounding the legitimacy of the Shanghai
Great World Guinness Book of Records, which was established in 1992 and
comes under the authority of the Shanghai branch of the Communist Party
Youth League, continues.
Guinness’ official branch in China is Liaoning Education Press, based in
the northeastern province of the same name.
According to an article on the website of Liaoning Education Press, it
has been the real Guinness Book of Records representative in China since
Shanghai Great World Guinness and the Guinness Book of Records split in
1996. In 2003, a Hebei businessman from Beijing sued the Shanghai office
after paying them a 1,800-yuan registration fee so he could set a world
record for the first bungee jump from a moving aircraft, believing the
organization to be affiliated to the Guinness publishers.—Xinhua |