|
The crying game: Male Vs female tears
Jocelyn Noveck
NEW YORK—“Please, please, please, just give the dog back,” Ellen
DeGeneres wept on national TV last week. It was a moment that quickly
established itself in the pop culture firmament, less for the plight of
Iggy the adopted terrier than for the copious crying itself.
Setting aside the question of whether those sobs were 100 percent
genuine, tears are a natural human response, and public figures are
obviously not immune. But some who study this most basic expression of
feeling will tell you that in this day and age, it can be easier for a
crying man to be taken seriously than a crying woman.
In politics, it’s a far cry (OK, pun intended) from 1972, when Sen. Ed
Muskie’s presidential campaign was derailed by what were perceived to be
tears in response to a newspaper attack on his wife. Whether he actually
cried is still up for debate. But decades later, an occasional
Clintonesque tear is seen as a positive thing. Bill Clinton, that is.
“Bill could cry, and did, but Hillary can’t,” says Tom Lutz, a professor
at the University of California, Riverside who authored an exhaustive
history of crying. In other words, the same tearful response that would
be seen as sensitivity in Bill could be seen as a lack of control in his
wife.
But there are additional rules for acceptable public crying. “We’re
talking about dropping a tear,” Lutz notes, “no more than a tear or
two.” And it all depends on the perceived seriousness of the subject
matter. Thus Jon Stewart or David Letterman could choke up with impunity
just after 9/11. But a dog-adoption problem is a whole other matter.
In a recently published study at Penn State, researchers sought to
explore differing perceptions of crying in men and women, presenting
their 284 subjects with a series of hypothetical vignettes.
What they found is that reactions depended on the type of crying, and
who was doing it. A moist eye was viewed much more positively than open
crying, and males got the most positive responses. “Women are not making
it up when they say they’re damned if they do, damned if they don’t,”
said Stephanie Shields, the psychology professor who conducted the
study. “If you don’t express any emotion, you’re seen as not human, like
Mr. Spock on ‘Star Trek,’” she said. “But too much crying, or the wrong
kind, and you’re labelled as overemotional, out of control, and possibly
irrational.” That comes as no surprise to Suzyn Waldman, a well-known
broadcaster of Yankee games on New York’s WCBS Radio.
Earlier this month, she choked up for several seconds on live radio
after the Yankees had just been eliminated from the playoffs. She was
describing the scene as manager Joe Torre’s coaches choked up
themselves, watching him at the podium and foreseeing the end of an era.
Her tearful report quickly became an Internet hit, and she was mocked
far and wide, especially on radio, with her voice, for example, played
over the song “Big Girls Don’t Cry.” “This turned into something pretty
ugly,” Waldman said in an interview. “I don’t throw around the word
‘sexist,’ but this was as sexist as it gets.” She also wrote a
passionate editorial in Newsday defending her brief display of emotion.
“While the anger and sarcasm that I can and do display is all right with
people,” she wrote, “the occasional tear is scary and is ridiculed.
Why?”
While Waldman notes that female anger in the clubhouse, is OK — it makes
her seem tough, she says — one recent study indicates that perceptions
of anger, too, differ according to gender. “When men express anger they
gain status, but when women express anger they lose status,” Yale social
psychologist Victoria Brescoll, who conducted three experiments on how
people perceive female anger, said in an interview. Her study is to be
published in the journal Psychological Science.
For a little historical perspective, says Lutz, author of “Crying: The
Natural and Cultural History of Tears,” it’s helpful to look back to the
19th century, when skillful politicians like Abraham Lincoln used tears
as a natural part of their oratory. |