|
SC dispels
martial law fears
By Saad Saud
ISLAMABAD—Pakistan’s top court rejected concerns that President Pervez
Musharraf would declare martial law if it rules his controversial
election victory invalid. The Supreme Court is hearing challenges
against his landslide victory in the October 6 presidential election,
which was boycotted by most of the opposition.
Musharraf, who seized power in a 1999 coup, cannot claim to have won
re-election for another five-year term until the court decides. The
general has not ruled out imposing martial law if the judgement goes
against him. “These threats have no value for us. This is an issue to be
decided in accordance with the law and according to the merits,” Javed
Iqbal, the head judge hearing the challenges, told the court. “The case
will be decided in 10 to 12 days,” he told the court.
The court started Wednesday hearing petitions against Musharraf’s
victory lodged by two candidates in the election who say Musharraf was
ineligible to stand while he is still army chief. The court had ruled
earlier this month that the election could go ahead but the official
result could not be announced until it resolved the challenges. The
general has vowed to step down as army chief and become a civilian ruler
once his victory is declared official.
His current term finishes on November 15. Musharraf has been at
loggerheads with the court since his failed bid in March to sack the
chief justice, a move that sparked mass protests and a slump in
popularity for the US ally.
PPP central leader Aitzaz Ahsan has said in-service person can not
become presidential candidate adding president can not retain post of
army chief as presidential office is electoral and political. He said
this while talking to the journalists outside Supreme Court (SC) here
Thursday.
“During the hearing of the case I have tried to prove before the SC that
general Musharraf got himself re-elected in unconstitutional manner as
his act of seeking votes from national and provincial assemblies was not
correct.”, he held. It is not under consideration of SC that president
Musharraf can retain the post of president by staying in uniform till
November, 15, he said adding the real issue on the other hand was that
if he qualified for this post and his nomination papers be accepted or
otherwise. Under the constitution it was mandatory for the presidential
candidate that he should meet the requirements of the provisions laid
down in the constitution related to this post.
“How it is possible that he gives a written statement “I am Non-Muslim
and I will become Muslim after my re-election or my age is below 45
years and I will reach age 45 after re-election. President Musharraf
view point that he has two posts and he will doff the uniform after his
re-election. It is a wrong logic and he can not be eligible for the
presidential election as he was in service government employee. He went
on to say that constitution did not allow army chief to become
presidential candidate.
Supreme Court (SC) has observed parliament itself has mandated general
Musharraf to retain dual offices. These observations were made by
justice Javed Iqbal during hearing of clubbed constitutional petitions
questioning the legality of acceptance of nomination papers by the
Election Commission in respect of general Musharraf for re-election and
dual offices case. .
Chaudhry Aitzaz Ahsan, counsel of Justice (Retd) Wajih ud Din Ahmad
while giving arguments said the decision of dual offices case has not
come yet. “ It would have been easy for me to advance arguments if the
detailed verdict had come”, he submitted. Justice Javed Iqbal remarked
some judges of this bench were not available.
|