Critics writing their lists, checking them twice
From Gregg Kilday

LOS ANGELES—The awards race is on. Not the race to position films for year-end awards consideration — that dance has been going on since at least the September trifecta of the Telluride, Venice and Toronto film festivals, if not before. No, the current race is the rush by film organizations and critics’ groups to be among the first to anoint the best films of 2006.
Current front-runner “Dreamgirls” actually got a trial trot around the track when selected scenes screened at a press event during May’s Cannes Film Festival.
For the regular moviegoer stuck in multiplexes showing “Turistas” and “Van Wilder 2,” the whole process has to look fairly mysterious. A number of the season’s highly lauded films, such as Sony Pictures Classics’ “Volver” and New Line Cinema’s “Little Children,” still are in limited-engagement holding patterns; others won’t be released for a few more weeks. The Weinstein Co. is rushing to ready its “Factory Girl,” for which it hopes Sienna Miller will receive attention for her role as Andy Warhol superstar Edie Sedgwick, for a one-week-only Oscar-qualifying run in Los Angeles via MGM starting December 29. In the meantime, to court awards groups, it has taken the unorthodox tack of screening a work-in-progress print.
Given the last-minute crush of films, the current rush to judgment can look almost arbitrary. On December 1, the International Press Assn., which fancies itself as an alternative to the Golden Globe-wielding Hollywood Foreign Press Assn., released an exhaustive list of nominees. Nominating seven films for best drama — alphabetically, ranging from “Babel” to “The Queen” — and another six for best comedy, it more than covered its bases. But it overlooked late-breaking movies like Clint Eastwood’s “Letters From Iwo Jima,” which just started screening last week and doesn’t open in limited engagements until December 20.
That oversight was quickly remedied by the New York-based National Board of Review, which Wednesday anointed “Letters” as its picture of the year. NBR isn’t necessarily a predictor of Oscar glory; it never included any “Lord of the Rings” movies on its lists of top 10 films, which tend to favour movies with more conventional literary or historical credentials.