|
Women’s emancipation &
Western values
PRESIDENT Pervez Musharraf has
assured women folk of Pakistan that more legislation to curb anti-women
practices in the society was on the cards. While addressing a gathering
of women drawn from all walks of life at Islamabad on Tuesday. President
Musharraf announced a number of measures designed to give women their
due share in national life. He once again defended the recently passed
legislation aimed at removing lacunae in the Hudood laws and dubbed its
opponents as hypocrites who stayed away from the National Assembly when
it was being adopted. He assured the women that no legislation would be
passed against the Islamic injunctions Islam. He stressed, attached
highest respect to the dignity of women and rightly claimed that the
present Government had given them much higher representation than ever
before in elective bodies including the Assemblies and the Senate.
On account of physical superiority, man has oppressed and abused the
weaker sex since times immemorial. With the growing awareness of their
rights, women even in the West managed to emancipate themselves from the
stranglehold of the male members of the society. However, in Western
society where the women stand liberated they have failed to achieve the
position of honour which Islam has granted them. They are being treated
as equal to men in all respects in terms of their rights and duties. The
protection which Islam provides them is missing in the Western society.
Accordingly, the women particularly divorced mothers are a pitiable lot.
They are subjected to all types of deprivation. In the Western society,
a single mother has to go through hell in raising children. The women
who live as partners for years with or without the sacred bond of
marriage are quite often kicked out of their homes and made victims of
domestic violence at the hands of their heartless male partners. The
Western woman is indeed a victim of the v injustices of a society in
which religion and morality are fast losing their value.
However, in a society where abject poverty exists or where due to
pervasive illiteracy, anti-women practices such as Karokari, Wani, Swara,
marriage with the Holy Quran or forced marriages of minor girls with men
of older age group etc are common, the woman finds herself at the mercy
of men. It surely goes to the credit of women rights groups who have
toiled hard and long for elimination of anti-women customs and
practices. This Government deserves to be commended for having supported
their struggle. However, a lot is yet to be achieved. While emancipation
of women should be our target, we should also make sure that our women
get same place of dignity and protection which Islam has taught. Western
concept of women’s freedom should not be copied.
The Government in its zeal to curb anti-women practices should not lose
sight of Islamic teachings which are abiding and a panacea for all
social ills.
Medals for failure
THE massacre of 8,000 men and boys at Srebrenica in 1995 is a crime
which ranks with the worst depravities in modern Europe, with the Nazi
destruction of whole communities like Lidice in Czechoslovakia or the
20,000 captured Polish Army officers slaughtered at Katyn by the
Russians. It demonstrated with sickening clarity the prevailing general
failure of the international community to confront Serb brutality with
resolution and courage.
It therefore beggars belief that members of the Dutch battalion who
surrendered to the Serb militias of Vladko Mladic, without firing a
shot, should have just been given medals for their service in the town.
This was one of the biggest humiliations ever suffered by the Dutch
military. Many of the 600 soldiers involved still feel revulsion for
their officers who caved in to Serb threats. There is equal disgust for
the fact that some of the force was told to help the Serbs separate the
men and boys from the women and children, after Mladic had calmed the
fearful populace by promising the males were being taken to prison
camps.
There is no denying that the Dutch commander Col. Thom Karremans found
himself in an extremely difficult position. He had been surrounded for
five days by much larger Serb forces in a town crowded with maybe 30,000
people, many of them refugees from surrounding villages. He had limited
supplies and ammunition and had no strong defensive points. The day
before he surrendered, 30 of his men had been captured without a fight
by Serb forces. When he called the French NATO commander Gen. Janvier,
asking for immediate air support, he was told it could not be provided.
When two bombs were finally dropped on the Serbs, they threatened to
execute their hostages and kill refugees.
Nevertheless, had Karremans taken a strong position from the start,
8,000 Bosnian Muslims might still be alive today. The Serbs might have
halted their advance or they might have attacked. But once the Dutch
started taking casualties, NATO would have responded vigorously.
Soldiers are wounded and sometimes they die. It is what they do. For 30
Dutch troops to have allowed themselves to be captured and disarmed
without a fight was unforgivable. For Karremans to allow the fate of
these men to influence his judgment on the fate of the 30,000 Bosnians
he was supposed to be protecting, was a cardinal dereliction of duty.
Five years later, after a damning report, the entire Dutch government
resigned.
The insignia awarded, eleven years after the Srebrenica atrocity, to all
850 members of the Dutch Battalion who served in Bosnia is in general
recognition of their service throughout the campaign. Yet it is entirely
appropriate that Bosnians, especially relatives of the dead of
Srebrenica, should be outraged at the insensitive decision to make these
awards at all. The abject failure to carry out their duty and protect
helpless civilians is something many Dutchmen may be trying to forget.
For those who suffered so terribly as a consequence of the Dutch
surrender, there is no forgetting and probably no forgiving either.
—Arab News
|