|
‘Never-ending kiss’ caps TomKat wedding
From Jake Coyle
NEW YORK—The lavish weekend wedding of Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes bore
many symbols of the singular 18-month relationship between the two
stars.
The decorous, romantic setting of a 15th-century castle in Bracciano,
Italy, was reminiscent of the fairy-tale quality of the actors’
courtship. The much younger Holmes, 27, had once remarked that she grew
up wanting to wed the “Risky Business” star.
“I used to think I was going to marry Tom Cruise,” Holmes told Seventeen
magazine before she and Cruise, 44, began dating.
But the young-girl fantasy theme to TomKat has never been the dominant
one. They have instead been renown for extreme publicness and perceived
peculiarity. In short, it is not a relationship that anyone has ever
really understood.
After exchanging vows before a Scientology minister Saturday, Cruise and
Holmes engaged in a “never-ending kiss,” according to Giorgio Armani,
who attended the wedding outside Rome and designed the outfits of the
bride, the groom and their baby, Suri.
That kiss could be seen a sweet gesture or as a reminder of the
hyper-love the couple (or at least Cruise) has openly displayed since
they first announced their relationship in April 2005 in Rome. Just a
month later, Cruise was hopping on Oprah Winfrey’s couch.
“I can’t be cool. I can’t be laid-back,” a starry-eyed Cruise said on
“The Oprah Winfrey Show.” “Something happened and I want to celebrate
it.”
Many were skeptical of the over-the-top emotion, suspicious that it was
an act to help publicize each star’s then-current movies: “War of the
Worlds” and “Batman Returns.” But those critics were temporarily
silenced when, in June 2005, the couple became engaged at Paris’ Eiffel
Tower - happily posing for photographers and reporters immediately
afterward.
The relationship, People magazine deputy editor Larry Hackett remarked
at the time, “was presented fully baked for public consumption.”
In stark contrast, the couple did not provide the public a peek of Suri
until 4 1/2 months after her April 18 birth, leading to fevered
speculation that she didn’t even exist. The couple finally unveiled her,
true to megastar form, on the cover of Vanity Fair.
Many celebrities attended the Cruise-Holmes nuptials, but the most
symbolic attendee was Brooke Shields. Cruise had very publicly
criticized Shields for taking antidepressants after the birth of her
first daughter; he apologized to her in person a few months ago.
The actor’s perspective on antidepressants echoes that of Scientology,
and Cruise became more vocal about his religion after firing longtime
publicist Pat Kingsley. Cruise’s sister, Lee Anne DeVette, took over as
his publicist in March 2004, but was replaced last November after
Cruise’s image seemed in decline.
The practices and beliefs of Scientology - a religion many other
celebrities practice with less scrutiny - are unfamiliar and strange to
much of the public.
The birth of the Cruise-Holmes baby, Suri, was surrounded by reports
that the couple would have a “silent birth,” in which no one surrounding
the mother speaks. And the couple’s vows Saturday included certain
Scientology fundamentals, such as promising never to go to bed without
communicating about any differences.
Cruise’s aggressive defence of Scientology was one of the reasons Sumner
Redstone, chairman of Paramount Pictures parent company Viacom Inc.,
claimed was behind Paramount’s decision to break ties with Cruise after
a long and lucrative relationship. The “Mission: Impossible” star
quickly rebounded when his company, Cruise/Wagner Productions, signed a
two-year financing deal with First & Goal LLC.
The legal circumstances of the couple’s Italian wedding weren’t clear,
since it was performed by a Scientology minister. Cruise’s publicist,
Arnold Robinson, said the couple had “officiated their marriage in Los
Angeles before their departure for Italy,” calling that customary for
couples marrying outside the United States.
The public, of course, loves a big movie-star marriage. But will the
castle ceremony help Cruise and Holmes restore a measure of normalcy to
their relationship, or serve as yet another unique spectacle?
With neither star expected back on the big screen soon (Cruise is slated
to begin shooting “Lions for Lambs” with Robert Redford in January;
Holmes has nothing planned) it will be a while before the box office
provides an answer. |