|
Forensic tests possible on Oval Test ball: ICC
NEW DELHI—The International Cricket Council said forensic tests may be
conducted on the ball used in the controversial Oval Test to ensure a
fair hearing for Pakistan captain Inzamam-ul-Haq.
"A forensic test is being suggested," ICC chief executive Malcolm Speed
told reporters on Wednesday. "The laws of cricket are clear on what
constitutes changing the condition of the ball.
"Lawyers of Pakistan and the ICC are studying what evidence can be put
forth."
The fourth and final Test between England and Pakistan ended in fiasco
at the Oval last month when Pakistan refused to take the field after tea
on the fourth day to protest being accused of ball-tampering.
The move led to umpires Darrell Hair and Billy Doctrove awarding the
match to England -- the first forfeit in the 129-year history of Test
cricket.
Inzamam was subsequently charged with ball-tampering and bringing the
game into disrepute. He now faces an ICC hearing scheduled in the last
week of this month.
Speed said the sport's world governing body will take every step to
ensure a fair hearing.
"We want a fair hearing," he said. "No final date has been agreed upon,
but it will be announced in a day or two.
"We don't want to sit on the side of the umpires. We don't want to sit
on the side of the team. We want to sit in between them and accept
whatever decision is made by the adjudicator."
Speed denied the ICC had delayed the hearing, initially to be held soon
after the Test, to allow matters to settle down.
"We were very keen and would have preferred to have the hearing in the
match referees' room right after the match as it happens in normal
circumstances," he said.
"But Ranjan Madugalle (the Sri Lankan adjudicator) had a serious
personal problem which needed his urgent attention. In no way we were
seeking to defer the hearing."
When asked if the power of awarding a Test would be taken away from
on-field umpires, Speed said the ICC could only consider the proposal if
it came through its cricket committee.
"We must bear in mind that on-field decisions have been made by umpires
for a long time," he said. "It has stood the test of time. We have
certain processes in place in the ICC to consider changes in the
laws".—Agencies |