|
Opposition’s stance not
constructive
THE Opposition parties unfortunately stayed away from the International
Donors’ Conference. President Pervez Musharraf, Prime Minister Shaukat
Aziz and U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan succeeded in stirring the
conscience of the world community which realized the magnitude of the
widespread disaster caused by the monumental earthquake of 8th October
and responded to the need for assistance required to rebuild the
shattered lives of some 5.7 million .The Opposition stance from the very
beginning has been to involve the Parliament in the relief and
rehabilitation operations. No civilian apparatus exists in our system to
handle the gigantic task of disaster management. An executive authority
trained to do this kind of job could alone cope with the nature and
scale of the disaster. The troops did an excellent job in rescue
operations and in restoring communication facilities. Day by day
inaccessible areas were reached. Relief goods were delivered by the Army
in far-flung and remote villages in otherwise difficult terrain.
Things are beginning to settle down. Thousands of injured persons have
been airlifted from quack zone for treatment in camp dispensaries, field
hospitals and in major towns. Food, clothes and tents have been
distributed amongst the traumatized people. Foreign Governments, NGOs
and local volunteers have joined hands with the troops in providing
immediate relief to millions of people. Gradually, Army is associating
the local elected representatives with the relief operations. Cash is
being distributed amongst survivors with the help of local
representatives to repair their damaged houses. Cash compensation has
been paid for those killed or injured in the great tragedy. Here, the
local representatives have been involved with this job which requires to
be carefully done. We as a nation have shown total unity and concern for
mitigating the sufferings of the survivors. However, black sheep are
always there. There have been reports of hoarding of relief goods by
some influential politicians and political workers. It is just as well
that Army is overseeing the operations to ensure that the funds and
relief goods generously donated by the people of Pakistan and the
international community are not siphoned off.
The relief operations are continuing, some seventy-five delegations from
foreign Governments, international agencies and NGOs had gathered at
Islamabad on 19th November to announce their assistance for the real and
time-consuming task of providing permanent home to the shelter less and
reconstructing the seriously damaged infrastructure. Their sole concern
was humanitarian. They had not come to play politics. It is indeed
disgusting that Opposition parties were not at hand to thank them. They
had instead decided to politicize the monumental tragedy. The
authorities responsible for continuing relief operations and
reconstruction phase are civilian. The entire effort of every one should
be directed to ensure that absolute transparency is being observed in
the utilization of huge funds and relief articles given by the world
community and the people of Pakistan. To cry foul at this stage is not
helpful or constructive. No specific charges have been spelt out. The
Opposition has given wrong signals to the outside world. It is no
service to Pakistan.
Breaking new ground
Egyptians
went to the polls again yesterday in Round 2 of the country’s
parliamentary elections. No one doubts that the ruling National
Democratic Party will be returned, possibly with a reduced majority. The
NDP won 68 percent of the seats in the first round. What is just as
significant, however, is the question of whether politics is truly
becoming more open in the Arab world’s most populous country. The
elections so far are testimony that the modernizing democratic face of
Egypt is developing. The country had its first contested presidential
election in September; it opened an unprecedented national debate on
political reform and civil liberties. Such openness has now extended to
parliamentary elections. Outright criticism of the government is being
permitted. The government is also allowing civil society groups to
monitor the vote and for the first time, ballot boxes are transparent.
Perhaps the biggest proof positive that the elections are free and fair
is the unexpected gains by the Muslim Brotherhood. Officially banned,
they have been allowed to campaign openly, fielding 150 technically
independent candidates nationwide. These candidates have been allowed to
hold campaign rallies, hang banners and distribute their platforms. As a
consequence, they have reaped the dividends. Independents standing on
the Brotherhood’s behalf have now more than doubled their seats in the
People’s Assembly. In the outgoing Parliament, the Brotherhood had only
17 seats; now they have 34 before voting has taken place in two-thirds
of the country. If the group maintains the same success rate, it could
control a fifth of the seats in Parliament.
Galvanized by the government’s willingness to allow greater
participation, other opposition parties, which are still small and lack
grass-root support, have buried their differences and formed a
coalition. They hope this will give them a better chance of reducing the
NDP’s majority. What will most likely transpire is the NDP will maintain
its dominant position, but with a larger and livelier opposition in the
People’s Assembly. At the very least, the mere fact that they are
competing shows how far the poll has gone in re-engaging ordinary
Egyptians in the political life of their country.
The Egyptian Parliament carries significant weight. Its new members will
consider a rewrite of the Emergency Law in place since 1981, plus a
continued transition to a free-market economy. It may also oversee a
presidential transition. The Parliament also holds a fair amount of
power over day-to-day affairs and can override government policies and
summon ministers for questioning. Mubarak surprised the nation in
February by calling for the first multicandidate presidential elections.
The ensuing presidential election in September received international
attention. This month’s parliamentary elections are also being closely
watched, both in Egypt and abroad, for indications of long-term
political changes in the country. What they see is a bold new grass
roots movement breaking new ground.
—Arab News |