World responds to Pakistan
earthquake
Khalid Khokhar
The Northern Pakistan earthquake of 2005 was an earthquake that occurred
at 08:50:38 Pakistan Standard Time on October 8, 2005 with the epicenter
in the Pakistan-administered region of the disputed territory of Kashmir
and Northern parts of Pakistan. The government’s official estimates of
the death toll (on October 21), was 51,300. Nevertheless, estimates from
regional officials placed the country’s death toll at 79,318 and is
expected to continue to rise, putting it higher than the massive scale
of destruction of the Quetta earthquake of May 31, 1935. Some estimate
that the death toll could reach 100,000. An estimated 3.3 million were
left homeless in Pakistan. Reports indicate widespread severe damage to
Balakot (almost completely wiped out), Garhi Habibullah, Rawalakot, and
Muzaffarabad (near the epicenter) where 30,000 are thought to have died.
The quake triggered landslides, burying entire villages and roads in
many areas of North-West Frontier Province and Pakistan-administered
Kashmir. Hundreds of thousands of buildings are thought to have
collapsed or sustained severe damage. One of two residential towers (Margalla
Towers), believed to contain up to sixty apartments each, collapsed in
the earthquake in Islamabad.
It has been estimated that damages incurred are well over 10 billion US
dollars. Although affluent and rich nations were very prompt in the
reconstruction efforts in the aftermath of the devastating earthquake,
but even small countries have not lagged behind in expressing
‘unconditional positive regard’ with the people of the Pakistan at this
juncture of colossal catastrophe. The heads of these countries have
expeditiously extended all possible humanitarian assistance and support
to the people of Pakistan to overcome the impact of this tragedy. The
Tunisian government has sent a C-130 plane with 14 tons of relief
supplies, including food, blankets, and medical supplies to Pakistan.
The Afghan government sent four rescue helicopters with four tonnes of
medicine and pledged USD 500,000 in aid. Cambodian has pledged USD
60,000 dollars in assistance. The Chinese government offered emergency
aid worth USD 6.2 million (PKR 370.14 M). The Hong Kong Government has
approved a grant of HK$3.5 million. Indonesia is sending a C-130
Hercules aircraft with a medical team, medicine and various emergency
materials to Pakistan. Iran has dispatched foodstuff, blankets, tents
and medicines through two aircraft. Jordan has pledged a 50-bed mobile
hospital to be deployed in Rawalkot. The Kuwait has sent USD 100 million
aid to Pakistan. Malaysia has dispatched a search-and-rescue team to
quake-ravaged Pakistan and USD 1 million (MYR 3.8 million) to its
government. Nepal has offered USD 50,000 dollars in relief to Pakistan.
Qatar was also willing to give humanitarian assistance to Pakistan.
Saudi Arabia has announced 133 million dollars for Pakistan. Singapore
expressed his deepest condolences and sympathies to the families of the
victims and dispatched a 44-member team to help Pakistan’s relief and
rescue operations. The South Korean sent USD 500,000 dollars along with
blankets, relief foods and medical supplies and further announced USD 3
million. Turkey is sending 30 aircraft carrying medical teams to
Pakistan, plus a relief package of USD $150 million. United Arab
Emirates dispatched humanitarian aid to the region. Belgian allocates
EUR 250,000 (PKR 18 million) and Flemish Government EUR 125,000 (PKR 9
million). Czech Republic will provide the victims with CZK 25 million (PKR
61 million). The Danish government has promised DKK 10 million (PKR 97
million) in immediate aid. Finland will allocate EUR 1 million. The
Dutch promised EUR 1 million adding EUR 10 million later. Sweden has
given 105 million kronor (13.4 million dollars approximately).
Switzerland dispatched ten disaster relief experts to Islamabad and
pledged CHF 1 million, and another CHF 750,000. Cuba is to send 200
doctors to Pakistan. New Zealand made an initial contribution of NZD
750,000 (PKR 31 million) to the international relief effort and further
extended by NZD 750,000 (PKR 31 million), bringing its total
contribution to NZD 1.5 million (PKR 62 million). Besides financial
support, most importantly is that these small countries firmly stand by
Pakistan in this moment of great distress. This has given a tremendous
boast and a will to encounter any contingency. Pakistan is highly
indebted to the deep concern and sense of sacrifice exhibited by these
small nations.
Relief efforts in many remote villages are hampered, as roads are buried
in rubble and many affected areas remain inaccessible. Heavy equipment
is needed to clear the roads and to rescue survivors buried under the
earthquake wreckage. Distributing relief supplies to the victims is
especially urgent as the victims face the risk of exposure to cold
weather due to the region’s high altitude and the approaching winter.
Many regions are facing an increasing threat of being cut off from help
as snow forces closures of even more roads in the mountainous region.
This is difficult for Pakistan to manage. Pakistan needs international
help to cope with earthquake relief operations. The magnitude of this
disaster is so vast that the Government alone cannot provide relief to
the people affected by this earthquake. “...a second, massive wave of
death will happen if we do not step up our efforts now”, Kofi Annan said
on 20 October with reference to the thousand remote villages in which
people are in need of medical attention, food, clean water and shelter
and the hundred and twenty thousand survivors that have not yet been
reached. In Northern Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir, the
Pakistan Army has been directed to extend all out help to the civilian
population in the quake-hit areas. All civilian and military hospitals
have been directed to deal with the situation on an emergency basis. he
President and the Prime Minister have appealed to the nation to remain
calm in the face of the calamity.
A generation is lost in the parts of Northern Pakistan and Azad Kashmir
hit by the October 8 earthquake, but it has ignited unprecedented
enthusiasm and spirit amongst Pakistanis to help settle the survivors of
the earthquake. It is tragic for the nation as a whole which lost its
enterprising and budding generation. Nevertheless, it is undoubtedly
soul stirring to see people from different walks of life, galvanized in
making all out efforts to voluntarily help the quake victims with
unflinching alacrity of purpose prevailing among the community.
Compatriots enthralled with sense of belongingness from various parts of
the country have started pouring in the earthquake-hit areas to
participate in the rescue operation. The fellow-countrymen showed
extraordinary willingness to help those in need of food, blankets,
medicines and warm clothing. It is not because they found the army
lacking or the government lacking; it is because people really wanted to
help. Pakistan needs help, support and sympathy, rather than gratuitous
criticism. We need to get those who may be injured out and into some
medical treatment. The Nation recognizes the heroes who acted promptly
in the face of extreme oddities and saved precious human lives.
India disposing off baby girls
Sobia Nisar
According
to a report titled ‘The Promise of Equality’ released by United Nations
Population Fund (UNFPA) on 12th October 2005, parents in India are now
turning to more modern methods of pre-natal sex selection, to dispose
off unwanted girls, resulting in skewed female to male ratio. The report
quotes Ranu, from the Northern Indian state of Rajasthan, who married at
the age of 18 and strangled her first two babies to death because they
were girls. She terminated two other pregnancies because the fetuses
were females. Yet she and her husband, Muktar, have no remorse about the
fate of their missing daughters. Ranu says, “I will kill other children
if they are born girls,” explaining that she is too poor to pay for
their weddings. All over Rajasthan and the rest of India, baby girls are
being eliminated either through sex-selective abortion or infanticide.
“The girl child is killed by putting a sand bag on her face or by
throttling her”, the report quoted Ranu as saying. “It is not a rare
phenomenon. It happens without hindrance.”
Far from being a practice that occurs only among the poor and
illiterate, the practice appears to be most prevalent in Indian regions
that boast high levels of educational attainment and relative
prosperity. While in developed nations the female-to-male ratios are
roughly equal, “in a number of regions in India, ratios have now
plummeted to 800 girls born for every 1000 boys.” Francois Farah, head
of Population and Development at UNFPA, blamed the phenomenon on what he
calls an ‘unholy alliance’ between the modern desire for smaller
families, available and affordable pre-natal screening technology and
abortion coupled with a strong preference for sons. Evidence indicates
sex ratio imbalances that are the result of selective abortion and
female infanticide or neglect.
According to analysts, although existing laws ban sex-determination
testing in India, about 60 million girls are ‘missing’- falling into a
demographic black hole from which there will be no return. As many as
two million fetuses are aborted each year for no other reason rather
than they happen to be female. Experts say that the two-child policy
that promotes the idea that the perfect family involves one girl and one
boy is partly to blame for the dwindling number of girls in India. The
Indian families are more likely to abort a female fetus if the first
child is also a girl. Nobody questions the very norms that make girls so
vulnerable in India in the first place. Either girls are married off
like a burden or get rid of before birth.
Meanwhile the sex ratio imbalances coupled with the traditional low
status of Indian women is also beginning to change traditional concepts
of the family. In rural Punjab, where the shortage of women is most
pronounced, a desire to keep rural family holdings intact is now driving
a trend towards polyandrous unions where one woman, often ‘purchased’
from poorer regions or from lower castes, is forced to be ‘wife’ not
only to her husband, but also to brothers and father-in-laws. Such women
are subjected to sexual and physical abuse. “The levels of violence in
these situations are unimaginable,” said Ena Singh, UNFPA assistant
representative for India. If these kinds of practices become widespread
it will be very destabilizing for society. While India aspires to be the
biggest and strongest democratic power of the region, it is constantly
engaged in securing a permanent seat in the United Nations Security
Council. How can India ever justify its claim of being largest democracy
and claim a position in the UNSC when the basic human rights factor is
jeopardized to such level. It is most important to note that in the
social indicators of literacy, poverty, basic health and human rights
factor India lags behind even her smallest neighbours in South Asia.
Chinese are coming: Sudan’s oil fuels Beijing’s
ambitions
Declan Walsh
A TANGLE of pipes and metallic towers rises over the shimmering,
rock-strewn desert north of the Sudanese capital Khartoum. The gleaming
oil refinery is the jewel of Sudan’s oil boom, the mid-point of a
900-mile pipeline from the southern oilfields to the Red Sea that is
projected to pump 500,000 barrels a day by the end of this year. But if
the oil is African, the money and management are Chinese. Inside the
refinery gates, Chinese engineers man the distillation towers, Chinese
cooks serve rice and noodles in the canteen, and workers pedal between
the giant oil drums on bicycles imported from Beijing. “We like Sudan
very much,” said Zhao Yujun, 35, a manager with the state-owned China
National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC), which built the sprawling plant
five years ago. ...China needs energy for economic growth. There is oil
in Africa. That is why we have come here.”
China is prowling the globe in search of energy sources. Oil executives
and diplomats have signed a flurry of deals, from Canada to Kazakhstan.
The scramble has triggered unease in Washington, where American
conservatives worry about China’s growing economic muscle, but has
sparked an unprecedented engagement with Africa. Chinese business is
blazing a trail across the continent. Trade with China has almost
tripled in five years. Railways in Angola, roads in Rwanda, a port in
Gabon and a dam in Sudan have all been paid for with Chinese loans and
built by Chinese contractors. Business with Nigeria and South Africa is
booming. And this year China is expected to overtake the UK as Africa’s
third largest trading partner. The driving ingredient is oil. China’s
flagship African project is in Sudan. Isolation from the west meant that
Khartoum barely pumped a barrel of crude a decade ago. Now, after
intensive Chinese investment, it has the third largest oil business in
sub-Saharan Africa.
China shipped in thousands of workers to build the Heglig pipeline in
record time, and a second pipeline is under construction. The Khartoum
refinery — CNPC’s first outside China - opened in late 1999, just in
time for the 10th anniversary of the coup that brought military leader
Omar Al Bashir to power. The gamble has paid off handsomely. Sudan is
expected to earn more than USD1bn in oil revenues this year and its
economy is one of the fastest growing in Africa. Meanwhile, China has
won a new ally to fuel its thirsty factories and exploding rate of car
ownership. ‘CNPC — your close friend and faithful partner’ reads a dust-
smeared billboard outside the Khartoum refinery showing grinning Chinese
workers in hard hats. “Our agreement is an example to others,” said
Mohamed Atif, the Sudanese deputy general manager. “The Chinese say they
are communists and socialists but they are deeply involved in the
capitalist system,” he said.
Where western companies shy away because of corruption, conflict or the
risk of losing their shirt, Chinese firms are plunging in. President Hu
Jintao has dispatched diplomats to dangle large, low- interest loans
before impoverished countries with the sole stipulation that work is
done by Chinese contractors. African governments also appreciate China’s
tendency to keep its nose out of domestic affairs. In contrast with the
demands for transparency that accompany loans from international bodies
such as the International Monetary Fund, Chinese help comes on a
strictly ‘no questions asked’ basis. But human rights campaigners warn
that this one-track expansionism offers succour to rogue leaders and
undermines efforts to foster transparency in some of Africa’s most
notorious governments. Earlier this year, Angola’s president, Jose
Eduardo dos Santos, who presides over a famously oil-rich but
poverty-stricken country, received a GBP1.1bn line of credit from
Beijing.
Beijing also came to the rescue of Zimbabwe’s embattled president,
Robert Mugabe, presenting him with ornamental tiles for the roof of his
palace and an honorary degree in recognition of his ‘remarkable
contribution in the work of diplomacy and international relations’. “If
you’re a corrupt government that wants loans with no conditions, you
will like the Chinese. But it’s not good for the people of the country,”
said Sarah Wykes of Global Witness, a UK- based lobby group. Western
hostility towards Sudan’s military regime paved the way for one of
China’s sweetest deals in Africa. In 1996, when the regime was an
international pariah for sheltering Osama bin Laden and human rights
abuses, CNPC bought shares in a government oil venture on highly
favourable terms.
At the Khartoum refinery, Sudanese and Chinese co-workers communicate in
a mix of Arabic, Chinese and English. In offices Chinese officials play
with their mobile phones beside Muslim managers kneeling on prayer mats.
But in the city Sudanese businessmen grumble that Chinese projects give
little and take much. “They bring everything from China — labour,
materials, the lot,” said one prominent trader who asked not to be
named. South Africans worry that cheap imports are swamping their
textile industry. Others say that China is stingy with humanitarian aid
and that its secretive culture fuels bribery and corruption.
|