|
Doable rehabilitation
strategy
PRESIDENT Pervez Musharraf will present before the international
conference of donors on 19’h November a doable strategy for
rehabilitation and reconstruction of the areas devastated by the 8t’
October monumental catastrophe in Azad Kashmir and the adjoining areas
of NWFP. Addressing the convocation of the National University of
Science and Technology at Rawalpindi on Thursday, the President assured
the millions affected by the devastating earthquake that the
reconstruction facilities would be much better than before through the
use of modern technology. The magnitude of widespread devastation is so
colossal that no country on its own could face the challenge. Pakistan
accordingly requires foreign and local assistance for this gigantic task
ahead.
The strategy to be unfolded would call upon the donors either to make
contributions to President’s Relief Fund or sponsor the construction of
a house, school, college, hospital or an entire village or town. Apart
from cash compensation to the bereaved families amounting to Rs. 100,000
each for those killed in the tragedy, the Government has started
distribution of funds amongst the affectees to enable them to repair
their damaged homes and re-start economic activity. So far a total
amount of Rs1407 million has been distributed. Initial estimates of US$
5 billion for reconstruction phase have been revised as more information
is pouring in on loss of human life, cattle and property. With over
87,000 persons officially counted as dead and some 100,000 wounded, the
funds required to rehabilitate millions are going to be huge. To date
Government of Pakistan has received foreign assistance pledges amounting
to US$ 2.33 billion against which cash remittances of only US$ 211
million have been received. The donors conference at Islamabad will be
attended by leaders of over 100 countries and top ranking officials of
international organizations. U.N. Secretary General Kori Annan will also
participate and urge upon the world community to assist Pakistan in the
colossal task of reconstruction.
Hopefully, with President Pervez Musharraf s presentation at the
conference and appeals from leaders of the international agencies and
friendly countries, the world will show greater generosity to help
alleviate sufferings of millions hit by past one hundred years’ greatest
natural disaster. Meanwhile US has increased its pledged assistance to
US$ 156 million and President Bush is sending a high-powered team to
make on the spot assessment of further requirements. It seems gradually
the world is realizing the magnitude of the disaster. With outside help
and help from people of Pakistan, the task of rehabilitating and
reconstruction will be come possible. The doable strategy to be
presented to donors will help generate necessary resources. Meanwhile,
winter has set in and rains and snowfall have commenced in the quake
zone. The sufferings of the shelterless are being compounded. With the
spread of diseases in tent villages and other areas, burden on medical
teams and hospitals is increasing.
A defeat for Blair
HAS British
Prime Minister Tony Blair suffered a fatal defeat in Parliament over new
anti-terror legislation that would have enabled police to hold suspected
terrorists for up to three months without charge? Despite a 66-seat
Labour Party majority, 40 Labour MPs ignored immense pressure from party
managers and voted against the government, defeating the proposal by 31.
Though pundits suspected the motion might be defeated narrowly, no one
had anticipated that the defeat would be so stunning. In order to
bolster the government vote, both Foreign Secretary Jack Straw and
Chancellor of the Exchequer Gordon Brown were called back from overseas
trips, the latter from a visit to Palestine and Israel.
Serious questions now hang over the future of Tony Blair, even though
Downing Street said immediately that they did not take the vote as being
an issue of confidence. The problem for the British premier is that he
put his name squarely behind the demand that the time terror suspects
could be held without charge be increased dramatically from the present
14 to 90 days. To back his case, he brought senior police officers to
brief parliamentarians on what he said was their unanimously expressed
need to have these new powers immediately. In fact, as with so much else
in the Blair government style, this was not entirely correct. By no
means all top police officers wanted this long period of detention
without trial. And herein probably lies the real reason for Blair’s
defeat. The British Parliament has been here before, specifically when
it was assured categorically by Blair that the country should join
America in attacking Iraq because of “indisputable evidence” from
British intelligence that Saddam had WMD that could be readied within 20
minutes. This lie and the subsequent inadequate public inquiries have
not been forgotten.
Therefore the debate in London yesterday may have been about legal
niceties — in the end legislators voted by an even bigger majority to
increase the time a suspect terrorist could be held to just 28 days —
but the real issue was why anyone should trust Blair again when
Parliament was being asked to commit to a radical new legislation. The
Iraq factor weighed heavy on the minds of MPs. Blair and his government
have grown used to winning — three consecutive elections and every
single vote in the House of Commons since he came to power in 1997. Last
night there was a look of bewilderment among top ministers who could
have accepted a narrow defeat but had never imagined such overwhelming
rejection. Since he had already announced that he would not lead Labour
into a fourth general election, there were those who believed, even
after this year’s election win, that Blair’s authority was damaged. Now
that damage is not in doubt. The only questions are how injured he is
and whether his colleagues, not least his heir apparent Gordon Brown,
will support and protect him. When the war against terror was hijacked
into an invasion of Iraq, Blair signed his political death warrant. Is
execution now far off?
—Arab News |