Home About Us Contact
 
Change Text Size: A A
  • English
  • Spanish
  • French
  • Italian
  • Portuguese
  • German
  • Dutch
  • Greek
  • Russian
  • Chinese(Simplified)
  • Chinese(Traditional)
  • Japanese
  • Korean
  • Hindi
  • Arabic
  • Urdu

Indian COAS loses war

Bureau Report

New Delhi Indian Army Chief General V K Singh has lost the war he waged. But this time, the Indian COAS has not lost the war in some battlefield like Kargil but it happened in the court room. According to the details, the Indian COAS, on Friday lost his legal battle on the age row in the Supreme Court which said the government's decision on his date of birth will apply for his service matters, forcing him to withdraw his petition.

The apex court told General Singh that he cannot go back on his commitment he made to abide by the government decision to treat his date of birth as May 10, 1950 and rejected the contention of "prejudice" and "perversity" against him.

During the three-hour long proceedings, the apex court applauded his 38 years of service to the nation, saying it was "proud" of having "meritorious" officers like General Singh and wanted to ensure that he continues to work and lead as chief the 13-lakh strong Army.

The court said the government's decision on his age issue would continue to be valid and refused to interfere with his service record which maintains his date of birth as May 10, 1950. According to this, he will retire on May 31 this year.

The arguments of General Singh, who had approached the apex court on January 16 for upholding his "honour and integrity", was a mix of legal points and emotions.

He submitted if the government was willing to accept his date of birth as May 10, 1951, he would resign within 48 hours but it did not cut much ice with the court which said it was "not concerned with determining his age" and his plea was only for recognition of his date of birth.

On its part, the government withdrew its December 30, 2011 order rejecting Singh's statutory complaint, as was first reported today by The Indian Express. The government told the bench it has "full faith and confidence" in the Army chief.

Attorney General G E Vahanvati told a bench comprising justices R M Lodha and H L Gokhale that the government was not questioning General Singh's "integrity" or "bonafides".

During the hearing, the bench said: "You left it to the authority to take a final call and you said you will abide by it. The commitment must be honoured even if it was not your actual date of birth. Ultimately they are the civilian authority and you have to accept," it further said.

The bench said "no prejudice" was done to General Singh and there was "no pervasity" or gross error in recognising his date of birth as May 10, 1950.

"The recognition of your date of birth did not suffer from any perversity. Prima facie there is no perversity. In good sense we want to know from you whether you want to withdraw your petition."

"We have examined the entire record. No prejudice was done to you. The government has full faith in you. It is not a question of determining the date of birth. How does it help you".

The Bench said Gen Singh's "writ petition was not for determination of date of birth but for recognition of date of birth".

"This is for recognition of date of birth in service record. Unless it is perverse and grossly erroneous, there is no scope of entertaining the petition by this court," the bench said.

General Singh's counsel Puneet Bali later told reporters that it was a victory for both side a the matter has been resolved "gracefully and amicably". He said Army Chief's petition was not for extension of service but a matter of "honour and integrity".

Before taking a break of 10 minutes, the Bench said Gen Singh has options, either he withdraws the petition or the court would pass the order after hearing him.

It made it very clear that in any case the court's order should not come in the way of his commitment to the nation as he has been serving for 38 years. "Wise people are those who move with the winds," the bench observed.

When the bench gave the option of withdrawing the petition, senior advocate U U Lalit, appearing for Singh, said he could say many things but was restraining himself.

At this, the bench said, "If dirty linen is to be washed, let that stink come out. You can argue. You can wash. You can wash."

"Till now, both parties have shown restraint and remained dignified," the bench further said.

Lalit subsequently withdrew the petition. The bench made it clear that its order on date of birth of May 10, 1950 would apply for service purpose and did not want to go into his age in civilian records as there was no challenge from any quarter to the date of birth mentioned in his matriculation certificate as May 10, 1951.

The court said that after leaving it to the government to decide his date of birth, Gen Singh at the "pinnacle of his career" chose to raise the issue when as an Army officer he has achieved what any army person "aspires".

The bench noted that three promotions were given to General Singh on the basis of the date of birth in 1950. "We have to hear the case within the four corners of judicial review," it said.

The court said three letters written by General Singh between 2008 and 2009 to the Army Headquarters reflected that he had left it to the Government to decide the issue.

"Why at this stage, at the pinnacle of your career this controversy? You hold such a high position. We have faith in system and we have faith in you".

"With all pains in your heart, that date of birth was not corrected and constantly taken as 1950. Undoubtedly, the decision was left at the hands of government authorities.

"This was well thought, well deliberated and you have respected your commitment repeatedly. "You got what a man in Army aspires to get. Then why all this"?

"Why do you want to get out of this now," the bench said adding that "We respect your pain".

"You have achieved what one aspires in the Army. You are a decorated officer. Why then a person of your status is getting into all this. Why this mess at this time. "Your right to come to court with your grievances. We don't accept that you are suppressing facts.

The scene inside court Though the proceedings lasted for nearly three hours in the jam packed court No 8 of the Supreme Court, the writing on the wall for Army chief General V K Singh was clear from the very beginning.

Though counsel U U Lalit sought to go into the nitty-gritty of the events, the bench of justices R M Lodha and H L Gokhale confined itself to only two major issues.

The bench persistently queried the counsel whether the UPSC corrected Singh's date of birth on his request and why he chose to "resile" from his commitments to abide by May 10, 1950, as his date of birth in the three letters signed by him between 2008 and 2009.

As the counsel failed to respond satisfactorily and instead attempted to argue on the various correspondence between Singh and government, the bench said ''the recognition of his date of birth as May 10, 1950, by the Army does not suffer from perversity and was not grossly erroneous" that warranted its interference.

The remark sent out a clear message that the court was inclined to reject General Singh's petition.

It then gave the option to Singh to withdraw the petition and said "or otherwise we will pass orders".

Apparently sensing Lalit's dilemma, the bench said around 1.20 pm that it was willing to reassemble at 2 pm to enable the counsel to seek instructions from Singh on the options left before him -- an offer, he lapped up.

Later, when the court reassembled at 2 pm, the Army chief attempted a last-ditch battle when Lalit said: "I will resign within 48 hours if the government is willing to decide my date of birth as May 10, 1951."

But it failed to convince the court which then dictated the order. Though on Mondays and Fridays, which are listed as miscellaneous days for deciding fresh petitions, matters are disposed off within a few minutes, Singh's case consumed nearly three hours.

 
Photo Gallery »
  Comments
..
Name Email
Title
Comment
 
     
  More inside The Daily Mail
Top Headlines Business Sports Showbiz
 
Copyright © 2002-2011 The Daily Mail. All rights reserved
Powered by The Daily Mail Creative Team